Current:Home > MyVoting Rights Act weighs heavily in North Dakota’s attempt to revisit redistricting decision it won -Infinite Profit Zone
Voting Rights Act weighs heavily in North Dakota’s attempt to revisit redistricting decision it won
View
Date:2025-04-14 07:43:22
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Months after it won a lawsuit over legislative boundaries, North Dakota is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its victory, baffling others involved in the state’s redistricting fights and prompting some legal experts to call the state’s action a potential assault on the Voting Rights Act.
At issue is a ruling by a federal panel over a lawsuit filed by Republicans challenging the constitutionality of a redistricting map that created House subdistricts encompassing two American Indian reservations. Proponents of the subdistricts said they gave tribal nations better chances to elect their own members. Last fall, a federal three-judge panel tossed out the lawsuit at the request of the state and the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation. The judges wrote that “assuming without deciding” that race was the main factor for the subdistricts, “the State had good reasons and strong evidence to believe the subdistricts were required by the VRA.”
The plaintiffs appealed.
North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley said the three-judge panel decided the matter correctly under existing case law — but for the wrong reason. The state argues in a filing made Monday that it “cannot defend this Court’s ‘assumption’ that attempted compliance with the VRA (or any statute) would justify racial discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
“We’re not seeking to reverse” the panel’s decision, Wrigley said. “We’re seeking to have it upheld but for the reason that race was not the predominant factor, and we think that we should prevail.”
But critics bashed the move as a questionable legal maneuver as well as an attempt to assault the Voting Rights Act.
“Imagine if you hired a lawyer, and that lawyer won the case for you, and then the other side appealed, and on appeal your lawyer argued that the judgment in your favor should be vacated and the matter should be sent back for a trial so that your lawyer could make some different arguments. Imagine that. I think in that scenario, you’d probably want your money back from your lawyer,” said Tim Purdon, who represents the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in their separate, successful lawsuit for a joint legislative district.
David Schultz, a Hamline University professor and a visiting professor of law at the University of Minnesota, said he thinks the action is part of a broader assault on the Voting Rights Act “to say that racial considerations cannot be used for any circumstances” when district lines are drawn.
Meanwhile, more than a dozen Republican-led states — most of which have engaged in legal fights over election maps — want the decision reversed. Last month, Alabama’s attorney general and the other states filed their brief with the court, saying they “have an interest in being able to accurately predict whether their redistricting laws will comply with federal law.”
Schultz also said he thinks the states see an opportunity now that the U.S. Supreme Court has a conservative majority.
Kareem Crayton, senior director of voting rights and representation at the Brennan Center for Justice, said, “This is sort of, to my mind, a question as to whether or not states are really learning the lessons that the Voting Rights Act was intended to help them embrace, which is you’ve got to treat communities of color as everyone else. They’re entitled to an opportunity to elect candidates.”
Key in the North Dakota case is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which forbids discriminatory voting practices based on race or color. Crayton said “these continued assaults on it raise questions as to whether or not these states actually want any fair consideration of election systems for people of color who are citizens of their states.”
In a statement, MHA Nation Tribal Chairman Mark Fox called it “extremely disappointing” to see Wrigley’s office now arguing “for this winning judgment to be vacated and this matter sent back down for a trial. We opposed this unconscionable change of position when the Attorney General raised it with us, and we oppose it now.”
Plaintiff attorney Bob Harms welcomed the state’s filing.
“I know the attorney general’s getting some criticism from people who feel like they won at the district level, but I do think that we have to step above that, about not just winning and losing but looking at constitutional principles and how they’re applied,” he said.
Wrigley said the Supreme Court will decide whether to have oral arguments and further briefing.
veryGood! (45157)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Officer seriously injured during Denver Nuggets NBA title parade
- Kristen Bell Suffers Jujitsu Injury Caused By 8-Year-Old Daughter’s “Sharp Buck Teeth
- High-Stakes Wind Farm Drama in Minnesota Enters Final Act
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Shoppers Can’t Get Enough of This Sol de Janeiro Body Cream and Fragrance With 16,800+ 5-Star Reviews
- What Really Happened to Princess Diana—and Why Prince Harry Got Busy Protecting Meghan Markle
- Prince Harry Shared Fear Meghan Markle Would Have Same Fate As Princess Diana Months Before Car Chase
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Trisha Yearwood Shares How Husband Garth Brooks Flirts With Her Over Text
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Unsolved Mysteries Subject Kayla Unbehaun Found Nearly 6 Years After Alleged Abduction
- Over-the-counter Narcan will save lives, experts say. But the cost will affect access
- Growing Number of States Paying Utilities to Meet Energy Efficiency Goals
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- 10 things to know about how social media affects teens' brains
- Malaysia wants Interpol to help track down U.S. comedian Jocelyn Chia over her joke about disappearance of flight MH370
- 18 Top-Rated Travel Finds That Will Make Economy Feel Like First Class
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
With student loan forgiveness in limbo, here's how the GOP wants to fix college debt
One of America’s 2 Icebreakers Is Falling Apart. Trump’s Wall Could Block Funding for a New One.
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $380 Backpack for Just $99
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Regulators Demand Repair of Leaking Alaska Gas Pipeline, Citing Public Hazard
Shoppers Can’t Get Enough of This Sol de Janeiro Body Cream and Fragrance With 16,800+ 5-Star Reviews
Is Your Skin Feeling Sandy? Smooth Things Over With These 12 Skincare Products